We want to make sure you get the best viewing experience for the content you are viewing. Our goal is to improve each visit with data that creates this experience for you and those you share it with. We appreciate your continued readership.

Sounds Good! Privacy Policy

escalation risks

Deterrence Without Resolve Is No Deterrence at All

Allies & Extended Deterrence, Archive, Strategic Adversariesadversary, alliances, Alpha-India Consultancy, ambiguity, Australia, autonomous systems, capability acquisition, capability development, conventional deterrence, credibility, declaratory policy, encroachment, escalation, escalation risks, extended deterrence, forceful response, grey-zone coercion, Indo-Pacific, Indo-Pacific Studies Center, ISR, long-range strike, maritime assets, messaging, military capabilities, National Institute for Deterrence Studies. , Nuclear Deterrence, Open Nuclear Network., perception, political resolve, political will, Red Line, resolve, sea mines, self-reliance, strategic competition, strategic failure, strategic signaling, strategic surprise, U.S. nuclear guarantees, undersea infrastructure, undersea warfare

Deterrence Without Resolve Is No Deterrence at All

Natalie Treloar0 Comments

Published: May 12, 2026 There is a comforting fiction at the heart of much contemporary strategic thinking: conventional military capabilities can substitute for nuclear deterrence without requiring the same political…

Read More

Understanding the Third Nuclear Age: Why 2026 Matters

Archive, Arms Control & Nonproliferation, Challenging Disarmament Disinformation, Strategic AdversariesAI-driven command structures, arms control agreements, China-Russia relationship, cold war, cooperation, cyber operations, Diplomacy, disarmament, doomsday clock, emerging technologies, escalation risks, global rules-based order, hypersonic systems, Miscalculation, missile defense, modernization, multipolar environment, NATO deterrence, New START, nonproliferation barriers, NPT framework, nuclear arsenals, nuclear catastrophe, nuclear disarmament, nuclear triad modernization, nuclear weapons capabilities, proliferation, radioactive materials, restraint, sovereignty, START I, strategic-stability dialogue, Third Nuclear Age, treaty events, U.S.-Russia arms control, verification technologies

Understanding the Third Nuclear Age: Why 2026 Matters

Harsa Kakar0 Comments

Experts call the current state of the world the third nuclear age, embodied by various emerging technologies. It is characterized by expanding nuclear arsenals, diminishing arms control agreements, and technological…

Read More

Exposing Willful Blindness: American Strength Is Nonnegotiable

Archive, Arms Control & Nonproliferation, Bonus Reads, Defense & Security, Strategic AdversariesAmerican nuclear posture, Arms Race, ballistic missiles, Berlin, China, cold war, Cuba, Defense Spending, Deterrence, Diplomacy, escalation risks, extended deterrence, global stability, humanitarian impacts, INF Treaty, Iran, Katerina Canyon, mutually assured destruction, NATO, nonproliferation, North Korea, Nuclear dominance, nuclear modernization, public opinion, Quds Force, RAND study, Russia, slcm-n, space-based interceptors, START Treaty, strategic stability

Exposing Willful Blindness: American Strength Is Nonnegotiable

Brandon Toliver10 Comments

Katerina Canyon’s op-ed, “From Deterrence to Diplomacy: Why Nuclear Dominance Is a Dangerous Illusion,” calls for restraint and diplomacy rather than a robust nuclear arsenal. While her concerns over escalation…

Read More