Topic:nuclear strategy — Global Security Review %

Archive, EAR Report, Strategic AdversariesArms Control, arms control agreements, Biden administration, Budapest Memorandum, CBM, China, Christian Science Monitor, cold war, conventional-nuclear integration, defense budget, Defense Spending, Deterrence, Elbridge Colby, escalation, Estonia intelligence, ethical dilemmas, extended deterrence, geopolitical shifts, INF Treaty, Iran, Iron Dome, MAD, military buildup, military competition, Minuteman III, missile defense, missile defense capabilities, missileers, mutual assured destruction, National Security, NATO, NATO alliance, New START, North Korea, Nuclear arms control, nuclear arms race, nuclear command and control, nuclear conflict, Nuclear Deterrence, nuclear deterrence credibility, nuclear deterrence system, nuclear doctrine, nuclear escalation, nuclear escalation ladder, Nuclear force, nuclear force execution policies, nuclear modernization, nuclear policy, nuclear proliferation, nuclear stability, nuclear strategy, nuclear threats, nuclear triad, nuclear umbrella, nuclear war, nuclear warfare, nuclear warfighting force, Nuclear Weapons, nuclear weapons development, nuclear winter, nuclear winter propaganda, Posture Commission, Reagan, Russia, Russian threat, SDI, SecDef Hegseth, self-reliance, Senator McConnell, Sentinel program, Space Development Agency, strategic deterrence, tax legislation, Ted Postol, Terrorism, Ukraine, US security policy, US-ROK deterrent

ICBM EAR Report for 22 Feb 2025

Peter Huessy0 Comments

This report, prepared by Peter Huessy for the week of February 22, 2025, covers various aspects of nuclear deterrence, defense budget developments, and geopolitical threats. Key topics include the Biden…

ICBM EAR Week of February 10, 2025

Peter Huessy0 Comments

Key Takeaways from: ICBM EAR Week of February 10, 2025 Overview The report, prepared by Peter Huessy, comprehensively assesses nuclear deterrence, strategic security issues, and emerging threats. It includes key…

Archive, Bonus Reads, EAR ReportAdministration Developments, Air Force Secretary, Arms Control, B-21 raider, China, Chris Yeaw., Congressional Developments, Defense Spending, Elbridge Colby, energy independence, escalation management, extended deterrence, flexible response, Frank Kendall, General Kevin Chilton, Gennady Gatilov, Geostrategic Analysis, Global Zero Proposals, House Budget Committee, ICBM, Iran, Iranian security threat, Iron Dome, Israel, Jill Hruby, Kevin Chilton, Kim Jong Un, Marco Rubio, Mark Rutte, Mark Schneider, massive retaliation, Michaela Dodge, Minuteman III, missile shield, multipolar nuclear powers, National Institute for Deterrent Studies, NATO, NATO security, Navy Secretary, NIDS seminar, North Korea, NPT, nuclear balance, nuclear C3BM, Nuclear Deterrence, nuclear deterrence mythologies, nuclear force reductions, nuclear implications, nuclear mythologies, nuclear proliferation, nuclear strategy, nuclear war, nuclear warheads, OPEC, Peter Hegseth, Peter Huessy, POTUS Authority, President Trump, Presidential Nuclear Initiative, Russia, Russia Defense Budget, Russian aggression, Russian military spending, SALT, secretary of defense, Secretary of State, Sentinel, slcm-n, South Korea, START, strategic stability, theater nuclear weapons, Triad Symposium, Ukraine, Ukraine conflict, US economic policy, US Nuclear Policy, USAF

ICBM EAR for 23 Jan 25

Peter Huessy0 Comments

ICBM Ear for the Week of January 23, 2025 Prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geostrategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrent Studies Key Takeaways Significant…

Archive, Arms Control & Nonproliferation, Deterrence & Foreign Policy, Strategic Adversariesballistic missile submarines, counterforce first strike, defense budget, deterrence studies , dynamic parity, ICBMs, intra-war deterrence, mobile ICBM launchers, nuclear arsenal, nuclear conflict, nuclear deterrent, nuclear strategy, nuclear triad, post-war armistice, strategic bombers, strategic sufficiency, survivable second-strike capabilities

Strategic Sufficiency Is Not Enough

Joe Buff0 Comments

In an August 23, 2024, webinar, Col. (Ret.) Curtis McGiffin and Adam Lowther, PhD, introduced the concept of “dynamic parity” as nuclear strategy for the next presidential administration. Their approach…

Archive, Strategic Adversaries2024 presidential election, Aaron Holland, adversaries, American credibility, American national security policy, bipartisan consensus, conventional aggression, Deterrence, first-use policy, global stability, great powers, humanitarian consequences, international politics, military capacities, moral and ethical considerations, National Institute for Deterrence Studies. , NATO, nuclear conflict, nuclear deterrent, nuclear no-first-use policy, nuclear posture, nuclear proliferation, nuclear strategy, nuclear umbrella, nuclear war, Peace and stability , pragmatic necessities, strategic ambiguity, strategic logic, University of Utah

Maintaining America’s First-Use Policy

Aaron Holland1 Comment

As the 2024 presidential election looms, the future of American national security policy, particularly its nuclear posture, is under scrutiny. Whether Donald Trump reclaims the White House or Vice President…

Archive, Strategic AdversariesActuaries, Actuary Science, China, nuclear attack, Nuclear Deterrence, nuclear strategy, Russia

Nuclear Deterrence Can Benefit from Using Actuarial Science

Joe Buff1 Comment

With the strategic environment getting more precarious every day, incorporating new methods of thinking about risk mitigation can aid the United States in better addressing the threat posed by Russia,…

Allies & Extended Deterrence, ArchiveChina, Nuclear Deterrence, nuclear strategy, Russia, strategy

Countering the Asymmetry of Nuclear Strategy

Jonathan Trexel1 Comment

The 2023 Strategic Posture Commission rightfully called attention to US strategic force deficiencies and a renewed emphasis on nuclear deterrence. The security dilemma is not like it was between the…