Georgia: A solitary peacekeeping mission on the edge of Europe

The EUMM can’t physically prevent Russian troops from arresting Georgian citizens across the boundary of breakaway South Ossetia, the main battleground of the 2008 war. Russian troops sometimes detain Georgian farmers who venture or stray across the boundary, which cuts through Georgian farms and villages. The farmers are usually released after paying a fine, which the Georgian side describes as a ransom.

“We have had 72 cases of arrests of Georgians at the South Ossetian ABL [administrative boundary line] just this year and sometimes we were able to negotiate humane solutions,” said Høeg. For instance, when the detained were elderly or sick, the EUMM was able to convince Russian border guards not to take the individuals to Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital.

To ensure the Georgians adhere to the boundary, Russian troops have been building a fence, walling South Ossetia off from the rest of Georgia. “From 2009 on we observed an increase in what we call borderization – the establishment of physical infrastructure that creates barriers for people moving: fencing, observation towers, surveillance equipment, controlled crossing points, patrolling,” said Høeg. “So the key finding that we saw through these years is the hardening of the ABL, as we call it.”

Tbilisi describes this as a “creeping annexation,” complaining that Russia keeps moving the border deeper into Georgian territory. Høeg sees the process differently: “Mainly, it is more about the line becoming more impenetrable, rather than [them] physical moving the boundary.” Until the 2008 war, farmers freely crossed their property when it straddled the South Ossetian separatist line. Now some find a Russian-built fence cutting through their property – even in some cases right through houses – taking bits of their land. “So for the people living there, the border has moved,” Høeg explained.

Perhaps the most unnerving incidents in recent years were the deaths of two Georgian men. One died mysteriously in South Ossetian custody last February; the other was shot by an Abkhaz border guard following a public argument in 2016. The incidents underscored Georgia’s and the observers’ limited ability to defend civilians.

But, despite these limits, the Georgian government is happy to have the monitors. “Although the mission is denied to enter [sic] the [Russian-] occupied territories of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region (South Ossetia), it represents an important stabilizing instrument that, at the same time, contributes to confidence-building among the war-torn societies,” Georgia’s Foreign Ministry told Eurasianet in emailed comments.

“Besides, the mission represents an impartial and reliable source for the international society to get accurate information about the security and human rights situation on the ground,” the statement added.

Protected and endowed by Russia, the separatist regions have little incentive to negotiate their status with Georgia. But even so, the EUMM says, all sides involved do have an interest in maintaining daily stability.

There are quotidian matters such as shared irrigation systems and electricity supplies that the breakaway regions need to coordinate, however grudgingly, with the Georgians. “There can be simple matters like a cow is missing and, it turns out, it went to the other side,” Høeg said, adding that the EUMM helps facilitate such discussions, leaving aside the question of a long-term solution. “We call it managed stability.”