<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Political Economy of Security	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-political-economy-of-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-political-economy-of-security/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 14:11:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe Buff		</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-political-economy-of-security/#comment-893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Buff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 14:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=29252#comment-893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another very excellent article by Aaron Holland. Readers interested in learning more about the history of the economic basis of wartime victory vs. defeat ought to watch the fascinating &#038; enjoyable &quot;War Factories&quot; series on YouTube, about Allied versus Axis defense industries in World War II. The U.S. has very sadly fallen a long way from those days of weaponry manufacturing superiority and hi-tech development supremacy. If we do not claw our way back toward the top very, very quickly, we are going to pay a horrific price rather soon.

While, per Clausewitz,  &quot;all wars are fundamentally about politics&quot; (or rather, geopolitics), they are usually won or lost based on depth of manpower and nimbleness of macroeconomic output. It is somewhere between ironic and terrifying that numerous &quot;progressives&quot; keep claiming loudly that America should spend even more on social handouts while we abolish our nuclear deterrence triad altogether in the name of &quot;world peace.&quot; And this at a time when the CRINKs are expanding their conventional and nuclear coercion and warfighting power to record high levels, while flexing their militaristic muscles in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Asia, the Arctic, and outer space!

What good is turning the U.S. of A. into the world&#039;s ocercrowded soup kitchen &#038; HQ of delusional pacifism, if our need for effective deterrence (of attack, invasion, &#038; even enslavement) is left in the lurch, and our precious, God-given Freedoms go down for the count? What happened to the USSR in Cold War I could easily happen instead to the U.S. in Cold War II -- but without any Putin-style resurgence -- if we do not rationalize our National Balance Sheet&#039;s spending amounts and allocations, and our debt. Otherwise, what&#039;s happening now to Ukraine could happen to us to, sooner or later. Aaron&#039;s message needs to be heard loud and clear in the next White House and Congress!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another very excellent article by Aaron Holland. Readers interested in learning more about the history of the economic basis of wartime victory vs. defeat ought to watch the fascinating &amp; enjoyable &#8220;War Factories&#8221; series on YouTube, about Allied versus Axis defense industries in World War II. The U.S. has very sadly fallen a long way from those days of weaponry manufacturing superiority and hi-tech development supremacy. If we do not claw our way back toward the top very, very quickly, we are going to pay a horrific price rather soon.</p>
<p>While, per Clausewitz,  &#8220;all wars are fundamentally about politics&#8221; (or rather, geopolitics), they are usually won or lost based on depth of manpower and nimbleness of macroeconomic output. It is somewhere between ironic and terrifying that numerous &#8220;progressives&#8221; keep claiming loudly that America should spend even more on social handouts while we abolish our nuclear deterrence triad altogether in the name of &#8220;world peace.&#8221; And this at a time when the CRINKs are expanding their conventional and nuclear coercion and warfighting power to record high levels, while flexing their militaristic muscles in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Asia, the Arctic, and outer space!</p>
<p>What good is turning the U.S. of A. into the world&#8217;s ocercrowded soup kitchen &amp; HQ of delusional pacifism, if our need for effective deterrence (of attack, invasion, &amp; even enslavement) is left in the lurch, and our precious, God-given Freedoms go down for the count? What happened to the USSR in Cold War I could easily happen instead to the U.S. in Cold War II &#8212; but without any Putin-style resurgence &#8212; if we do not rationalize our National Balance Sheet&#8217;s spending amounts and allocations, and our debt. Otherwise, what&#8217;s happening now to Ukraine could happen to us to, sooner or later. Aaron&#8217;s message needs to be heard loud and clear in the next White House and Congress!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
