<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Perilous Void: Imagining a World without U.S. Nuclear Deterrence	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-perilous-void-imagining-a-world-without-u-s-nuclear-deterrence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-perilous-void-imagining-a-world-without-u-s-nuclear-deterrence/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph Buff		</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-perilous-void-imagining-a-world-without-u-s-nuclear-deterrence/#comment-146</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Buff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=27503#comment-146</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aaron Holland has penned another percipient thought-piece on the vital importance of the U.S. modernizing with urgency our nuclear deterrent&#039;s full triad and all supporting infrastructure. In this article he focuses on the sheer folly of still clinging -- in today&#039;s increasingly violent, multipolar, multi-nuclear world -- to the utopian delusion of all of humanity abandoning forever all nuclear arms. To do that, methinks, would leave the world wide open to exactly the sort of years-long industrialized slaughterfests of the 20th century, updated to the 21st, that the Atomic Age has helped us escape through a balance of nuclear power between sides. Worse, a bloody, massively destructive conventional World War III would certainly bring on &quot;Super (Fusion Bomb) Manhattan Projects&quot; among all the major combatants. Then, during such another global conventional shooting war, when restraint and international law are already worn past the breaking point, the first belligerent to get H-bombs would surely use them -- precipitating the very nuclear holocaust that &quot;abolition&quot; was meant to avoid! Far better to sustain a nuclear deterrence status quo, of approximate parity, between democracies and dictatorships.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Holland has penned another percipient thought-piece on the vital importance of the U.S. modernizing with urgency our nuclear deterrent&#8217;s full triad and all supporting infrastructure. In this article he focuses on the sheer folly of still clinging &#8212; in today&#8217;s increasingly violent, multipolar, multi-nuclear world &#8212; to the utopian delusion of all of humanity abandoning forever all nuclear arms. To do that, methinks, would leave the world wide open to exactly the sort of years-long industrialized slaughterfests of the 20th century, updated to the 21st, that the Atomic Age has helped us escape through a balance of nuclear power between sides. Worse, a bloody, massively destructive conventional World War III would certainly bring on &#8220;Super (Fusion Bomb) Manhattan Projects&#8221; among all the major combatants. Then, during such another global conventional shooting war, when restraint and international law are already worn past the breaking point, the first belligerent to get H-bombs would surely use them &#8212; precipitating the very nuclear holocaust that &#8220;abolition&#8221; was meant to avoid! Far better to sustain a nuclear deterrence status quo, of approximate parity, between democracies and dictatorships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
