<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Operational Logic of Nuclear Weapons Use by an Adversary	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-operational-logic-of-nuclear-weapons-use-by-an-adversary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-operational-logic-of-nuclear-weapons-use-by-an-adversary/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 22:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph Buff		</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-operational-logic-of-nuclear-weapons-use-by-an-adversary/#comment-91</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Buff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 22:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=26690#comment-91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Retired General Gericke&#039;s article is an impressively concise and pithy precis of how and why America&#039;s adversaries can (and do) consider their many low-yield nukes to be eminently useable (if not essential) battlefield weapons -- i.e., just really huge artillery rounds in a war against the US, when speed is of the essence in achieving decisive destructive/disruptive effect along with an immense shock-and-awe bonus. As the good general states in conclusion, the US and NATO and our other allies around the globe must wake up and prepare to meet this threat 1 on 1 if we are to have a hope of deterring war or prevailing in case deterrence fails. Nuclear terrorism is a separate issue he also addresses, a nuke-armed terrorist would feel no constraints to first use, so an absolute priority must be given to nuclear counterterrorism and counterproliferation!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retired General Gericke&#8217;s article is an impressively concise and pithy precis of how and why America&#8217;s adversaries can (and do) consider their many low-yield nukes to be eminently useable (if not essential) battlefield weapons &#8212; i.e., just really huge artillery rounds in a war against the US, when speed is of the essence in achieving decisive destructive/disruptive effect along with an immense shock-and-awe bonus. As the good general states in conclusion, the US and NATO and our other allies around the globe must wake up and prepare to meet this threat 1 on 1 if we are to have a hope of deterring war or prevailing in case deterrence fails. Nuclear terrorism is a separate issue he also addresses, a nuke-armed terrorist would feel no constraints to first use, so an absolute priority must be given to nuclear counterterrorism and counterproliferation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
