<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Topic:US economic policy &#8212; Global Security Review %</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/us-economic-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/us-economic-policy/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>ICBM EAR for 23 Jan 25</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonus Reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administration Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-21 raider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Yeaw.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elbridge Colby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escalation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extended deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Kendall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Kevin Chilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gennady Gatilov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geostrategic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Zero Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Budget Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian security threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Hruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Chilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Jong Un]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Rutte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massive retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaela Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minuteman III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multipolar nuclear powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institute for Deterrent Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIDS seminar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear C3BM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear deterrence mythologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear force reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear mythologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Hegseth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POTUS Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Nuclear Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia Defense Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SALT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentinel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slcm-n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[START]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triad Symposium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economic policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Nuclear Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=29937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICBM Ear for the Week of January 23, 2025 Prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geostrategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrent Studies Key Takeaways Significant Military Budget Increase in Russia: Russia’s defense spending will rise by 25% to 13.5 trillion rubles (~130 billion euros), continuing its high military expenditure trend. [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/">ICBM EAR for 23 Jan 25</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ICBM Ear for the Week of January 23, 2025</strong></p>
<p><strong>Prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geostrategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrent Studies</strong></p>
<p><strong><u>Key Takeaways</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Significant Military Budget Increase in Russia:</strong> Russia’s defense spending will rise by 25% to 13.5 trillion rubles (~130 billion euros), continuing its high military expenditure trend.</li>
<li><strong>U.S. Defense Leadership Changes:</strong> Senator Marco Rubio has been confirmed as Secretary of State, with several other key appointments, including Peter Hegseth as Secretary of Defense.</li>
<li><strong>Nuclear Policy and Strategic Posture Adjustments:</strong> Discussions on nuclear deterrence focus on the modernization of U.S. strategic forces, balancing deterrence against Russia and China, and the implications of extended deterrence.</li>
<li><strong>Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Capabilities:</strong> Reports indicate Iranian cargo vessels carrying crucial chemical ingredients for missile propellant, raising concerns about Iran&#8217;s growing missile capability.</li>
<li><strong>Ukraine Conflict and NATO’s Deterrence Mission:</strong> NATO leaders stress that a Russian victory would severely weaken the alliance&#8217;s credibility.</li>
<li><strong>U.S. Nuclear Strategy and Extended Deterrence Debates:</strong> Several officials emphasize the need for a robust and adaptable nuclear strategy to counter emerging threats from Russia, China, and Iran.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>International Developments</u></strong></p>
<p><strong>Russia’s Defense Budget Expansion</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Russia&#8217;s military spending will increase to <strong>13.5 trillion rubles</strong>, estimated at <strong>7-8% of GDP</strong>, its highest post-Soviet military budget.</li>
<li>Significant investments in <strong>modernized nuclear and conventional forces</strong> to maintain strategic parity with the U.S. and NATO.</li>
<li>Russia’s total defense expenditure, when adjusted for purchasing power, rivals European military spending, highlighting its focus on long-term military capabilities.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Iran’s Missile and Nuclear Advancements</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Intelligence sources indicate <strong>Iranian cargo ships transporting missile propellant materials from China</strong>, raising alarms among Western security analysts.</li>
<li>Iran continues <strong>uranium enrichment</strong>, prompting <strong>warnings from the UN</strong> about Tehran’s growing nuclear capability.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>China &amp; Russia’s Nuclear Expansion</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Reports predict that by <strong>2035, China and Russia will collectively hold over 11,000 nuclear warheads</strong>, posing a direct challenge to U.S. nuclear deterrence.</li>
<li>Concerns grow over <strong>China’s accelerated nuclear development</strong> and its integration into a broader strategic competition with the U.S. and Russia.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>Key Strategic Issues on the Horizon</u></strong></p>
<p><strong>Escalation Risks in Space Warfare</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A <strong>RAND Corporation study</strong> warns that <strong>Russia may escalate conflicts in space</strong> early due to its <strong>heightened fears of a U.S. first strike</strong>.</li>
<li>The study underscores Moscow’s <strong>increasing risk tolerance</strong> and potential responses to perceived U.S. threats in space.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Ukraine’s Role in NATO’s Deterrence Strategy</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte</strong> warns that a Russian victory would weaken NATO’s credibility, requiring significant investments in deterrence.</li>
<li>U.S. extended deterrence remains <strong>under scrutiny</strong>, with debates over whether the <strong>Biden administration’s fear of escalation weakened deterrence against Russia</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>U.S. Strategic Nuclear Force Modernization</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The <strong>U.S. Air Force confirms</strong> that the <strong>Sentinel ICBM and B-21 Raider</strong> will remain the cornerstone of nuclear deterrence until at least 2050.</li>
<li>Discussions continue over potential <strong>mobile ICBM systems, expanded long-range bombers, and additional dual-use aircraft</strong> to ensure nuclear survivability.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>‘Iron Dome for America’ Missile Defense System</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>President <strong>Trump’s proposal for a nationwide missile defense system</strong>—similar to Israel’s Iron Dome—is gaining momentum.</li>
<li>Critics call it <strong>overly ambitious</strong>, but proponents argue that it is essential to <strong>counter growing threats from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>Key Events</u></strong></p>
<p><strong>Upcoming NIDS Seminar (January 31, 2025)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Speakers:</strong> Shoshana Byren (Jewish Policy Center) &amp; Ilan Berman (American Foreign Policy Council).</li>
<li><strong>Topic:</strong> Iranian security threats to the U.S. and its allies, with a focus on Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>NIDS conference at Truman Library (August 6, 2025)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A <strong>4-star USAF officer</strong> will serve as the featured speaker.</li>
<li>Expected discussions on <strong>extended deterrence, strategic stability, and nuclear policy</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>Conclusion</u></strong></p>
<p>The <strong>ICBM Ear report for the week of January 23, 2025</strong>, highlights key developments in <strong>U.S. nuclear policy, global security challenges, and strategic deterrence issues</strong>. With <strong>Russia&#8217;s increasing military budget, Iran&#8217;s missile advancements, and China’s nuclear expansion</strong>, the U.S. faces <strong>a growing multipolar nuclear environment</strong>. Discussions on <strong>extended deterrence, arms control, and new strategic capabilities</strong> will shape U.S. defense posture in the coming years. The upcoming <strong>TRIAD Symposium and NIDS events</strong> will provide further insights into these critical security matters.</p>
<p><a href="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-Ear-for-the-week-of-January-23.pdf"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-29877 size-medium" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT-300x83.png" alt="" width="300" height="83" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT-300x83.png 300w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png 450w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/">ICBM EAR for 23 Jan 25</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
