<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Topic:political unity &#8212; Global Security Review %</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/political-unity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/political-unity/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 10:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Evolving Context for Deterrence</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-evolving-context-for-deterrence/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-evolving-context-for-deterrence/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Cimbala&nbsp;&&nbsp;Adam Lowther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Allies & Extended Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional-nuclear integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deterrence strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypersonic Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political unity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warfare]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=28789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This article, &#8220;The Evolving Context for Deterrence&#8221; by Prof. Stephen J. Cimbala and Dr. Adam Lowther was published in the Joint Airpower Competency Center journal, viewpoints edition 38.  Its main discussion centers on how NATO faces significant and evolving challenges in maintaining effective deterrence in the face of modern geopolitical and technological developments. The authors [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-evolving-context-for-deterrence/">The Evolving Context for Deterrence</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article, &#8220;The Evolving Context for Deterrence&#8221; by Prof. Stephen J. Cimbala and Dr. Adam Lowther was published in the Joint Airpower Competency Center journal, viewpoints edition 38.  Its main discussion centers on how NATO faces significant and evolving challenges in maintaining effective deterrence in the face of modern geopolitical and technological developments. The authors discuss the complexities introduced by cyber and space domains, the threat of Russian aggression, the potential for Chinese military action, and the role of advanced technologies such as hypersonic weapons and drones. It emphasizes the importance of a united NATO response and the need for both policy and technological advancements to ensure robust deterrence capabilities. They argue that modern deterrence is more uncertain and complex than during the Cold War, necessitating a comprehensive and adaptable approach to meet current and future threats, and highlight key challenges facing NATO&#8217;s deterrence strategy, including cyberattacks, space asset vulnerabilities, hypersonic weapons, missile defense, drones, conventional-nuclear integration, China&#8217;s nuclear capabilities, and political unity within member-states.</p>
<div id="answer_copyable_31232775-9623-4646-8aa7-db971983de5b" class="copyable_answers" data-testid="qna_answer">
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdown___oYf6O">For NATO to improve its deterrence strategy it must prioritize cybersecurity, enhance space asset resilience, address hypersonic threats, improve missile defense systems, adapt to drone warfare, deter conventional-nuclear integration, monitor China&#8217;s nuclear capabilities, and strengthen political unity.</div>
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/The-Evolving-Context-for-Deterrence.pdf"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-28497 size-medium" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Download3-300x83.png" alt="" width="300" height="83" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Download3-300x83.png 300w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Download3.png 450w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></div>
<div></div>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdown___oYf6O">​</div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-evolving-context-for-deterrence/">The Evolving Context for Deterrence</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/the-evolving-context-for-deterrence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
