<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Topic:News Nuggets. ​ &#8212; Global Security Review %</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/news-nuggets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/news-nuggets/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>ICBM EAR Week of March 3, 2025</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bonus Reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Adversaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administration Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appointees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edelman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European nuke deterrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geo-Strategic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland missile defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaela Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institute for Deterrence Studies. ​]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Nuggets. ​]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nixon Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuke Mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Blues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia border strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Hanson Essay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=30270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Executive Summary Why You Need This Report The ICBM EAR (Emerging Affairs Report) for the Week of March 3, 2025, prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geo-Strategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies, offers an authoritative, real-time assessment of critical defense and strategic developments impacting U.S. national security. This report [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/">ICBM EAR Week of March 3, 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Executive Summary</strong></p>
<p><strong>Why You Need This Report</strong></p>
<p>The ICBM EAR (Emerging Affairs Report) for the Week of March 3, 2025, prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geo-Strategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies, offers an authoritative, real-time assessment of critical defense and strategic developments impacting U.S. national security. This report consolidates essential intelligence and policy analysis on ICBM modernization, homeland missile defense, congressional budget battles, strategic threats from China, Russia, and Iran, and broader global deterrence dynamics.</p>
<p>As global threats intensify, <strong>policymakers, defense professionals, and industry leaders</strong> need a consolidated, insightful briefing to navigate the shifting landscape of great power competition and nuclear deterrence strategy. This report <strong>delivers precisely that—essential updates, expert commentary, and strategic foresight that decision-makers cannot afford to overlook.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Key Themes &amp; Strategic Insights</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong> Critical Developments in Homeland Missile Defense &amp; Nuclear Deterrence</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>The &#8220;Golden Dome&#8221; missile defense initiative, backed by congressional leaders and STRATCOM, underscores a growing commitment to protecting the U.S. homeland from emerging missile threats.</li>
<li>General Alvin, USAF Chief of Staff, affirms the Air Force’s pivotal role in nuclear deterrence and missile defense, reinforcing its responsibility for two-thirds of the nuclear triad and three-fourths of nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3).</li>
<li>Upcoming ICBM infrastructure modernization at Vandenberg Space Force Base highlights the urgency of maintaining a credible nuclear deterrent against adversarial advancements.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="2">
<li><strong> Congressional &amp; Budgetary Realities Impacting National Defense</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>As the FY25 budget debate intensifies, the threat of a yearlong Continuing Resolution (CR) poses risks to defense funding, potentially leaving the U.S. military underfunded by $8 billion below proposed levels.</li>
<li>Misinformation regarding an “8% defense cut” is addressed—while no drastic cuts are proposed, funding reallocations emphasize priority programs like Sentinel ICBM modernization and Columbia-class submarines.</li>
<li>With a $2 trillion annual deficit, balancing national security needs with fiscal realities remains a critical challenge.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="3">
<li><strong> Growing Threats from China, Russia, and Iran</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>China’s defense budget expands by 7.2%, accelerating military modernization, expanding nuclear capabilities, and strengthening island chain defenses in the Pacific.</li>
<li>Russia’s Arctic militarization, border buildups, and nuclear brinkmanship highlight its continued push for strategic dominance.</li>
<li>Iran’s sevenfold increase in highly enriched uranium (HEU) production, coupled with escalating proxy conflicts, presents a growing nuclear proliferation threat.</li>
<li>European defense spending surge ($860 billion over four years) signals a shift in NATO’s strategic posture amidst rising concerns over Russia’s long-term objectives.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="4">
<li><strong> Global Security &amp; Deterrence Policy: Special Reports &amp; Expert Analyses</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Heritage Foundation’s assessment of nuclear modernization emphasizes the necessity of rebuilding U.S. strategic deterrent forces to counter the evolving nuclear threats from Beijing, Moscow, and Tehran.</li>
<li>Michaela Dodge’s critical review of arms control policy challenges the viability of future U.S.-Russia agreements given Russia’s record of treaty violations.</li>
<li>Victor Davis Hanson debunks misconceptions about U.S. deterrence strategies, highlighting historical lessons in negotiations and military strength.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="5">
<li><strong> The Ukraine Corner: Understanding the Stakes</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Russia’s history of broken agreements, including violations of the Minsk Accords and Budapest Memorandum, justifies Ukraine’s insistence on binding security guarantees.</li>
<li>European defense commitments remain uncertain, despite recent rhetoric supporting increased military readiness.</li>
<li>U.S. policy under the Trump administration seeks to reshape geopolitical alignments, reduce Middle East entanglements, and focus on countering China.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ICBM-EAR-Week-of-March-3.pdf"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-29877" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png" alt="" width="331" height="92" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png 450w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT-300x83.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 331px) 100vw, 331px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/">ICBM EAR Week of March 3, 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
