<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Topic:mutual assured destruction &#8212; Global Security Review %</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/mutual-assured-destruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/mutual-assured-destruction/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>ICBM EAR Report for 22 Feb 2025</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-22-feb-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-22-feb-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Adversaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms control agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biden administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budapest Memorandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Science Monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional-nuclear integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elbridge Colby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escalation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estonia intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical dilemmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extended deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolitical shifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INF Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military buildup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minuteman III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile defense capabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missileers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual assured destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New START]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear arms control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear arms race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear command and control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear deterrence credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear deterrence system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear escalation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear escalation ladder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear force execution policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear modernization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear triad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear umbrella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear warfighting force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear winter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear winter propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posture Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SecDef Hegseth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-reliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentinel program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Development Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Postol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US security policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-ROK deterrent]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=30161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This report, prepared by Peter Huessy for the week of February 22, 2025, covers various aspects of nuclear deterrence, defense budget developments, and geopolitical threats. Key topics include the Biden administration&#8217;s approach to nuclear escalation, Senator McConnell&#8217;s retirement and his views on restoring deterrence, and Russian official Medvedev&#8217;s nuclear threats. The House and Senate have [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-22-feb-2025/">ICBM EAR Report for 22 Feb 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="answer_copyable_21811e0e-71c9-41c9-9188-3b92cf83bbe7" class="copyable_answers" data-testid="qna_answer">
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdown___oYf6O">
<p>This report, prepared by Peter Huessy for the week of February 22, 2025, covers various aspects of nuclear deterrence, defense budget developments, and geopolitical threats.</p>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">
<p>Key topics include the Biden administration&#8217;s approach to nuclear escalation, Senator McConnell&#8217;s retirement and his views on restoring deterrence, and Russian official Medvedev&#8217;s nuclear threats.</p>
</div>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">The House and Senate have added $100-150 billion over ten years to defense, focusing on expanding the Navy, strengthening the defense industrial base, and modernizing strategic nuclear forces.</div>
<p>​<br />
SecDef Hegseth seeks an additional $50 billion for top priorities, excluding nuclear deterrence from budget cuts.</p>
<p>The report highlights the importance of concurrent modernization work at the three ICBM bases, which could save billions.</p>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">
<p>It also discusses the U.S. Air Force missileers&#8217; critical role in nuclear deterrence, the ethical and psychological aspects of their job, and the challenges of retaining diverse personnel.</p>
</div>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">The Christian Science Monitor provides an in-depth look at the missileers&#8217; responsibilities and the evolving nuclear landscape.</div>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">
<p>Regarding North Korea, USAF General Jason Armagost emphasized that the U.S. can respond overwhelmingly to a North Korean ICBM attack, underscoring the strength of the U.S. nuclear deterrence system.</p>
</div>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">
<p>The report also touches on the potential for arms control negotiations with Russia and China, with President Trump expressing a desire for &#8220;denuclearization.&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">
<p>However, the feasibility of such agreements remains uncertain, given the geopolitical complexities and the need for the U.S. to maintain a competitive edge in military capabilities.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p><strong>MUST READ: </strong> The most awe-inspiring piece of the report is about  &#8220;RESPONSIBILITY&#8221; from the Christian Science Monitor, dated February 14, 2025, which provides an in-depth look at the lives and duties of U.S. Air Force missileers stationed at F.E. Warren Air Force Base.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div id="answer_copyable_ba69641a-49fa-483c-9f2d-eeba74404026" class="copyable_answers" data-testid="qna_answer">
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdown___oYf6O">
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-30165" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICBM-Launch-Panel.png" alt="" width="341" height="228" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICBM-Launch-Panel.png 470w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICBM-Launch-Panel-300x200.png 300w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICBM-Launch-Panel-360x240.png 360w" sizes="(max-width: 341px) 100vw, 341px" /></p>
<ul>
<li class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">It highlights their critical role in nuclear deterrence, the gravity of their mission, and the personal and ethical complexities they face.</li>
<li class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">The article follows missileers during their 24-hour shifts, emphasizing their readiness and strict operational protocols.</li>
<li class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">It also explores the mental burden and moral dilemmas they encounter, particularly in the context of faith.</li>
<li class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">The piece touches on the historical context of missileers, their continued relevance, and the growing nuclear threats from Russia, China, and Iran.</li>
<li class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">Additionally, it discusses the challenges of attracting and retaining personnel, especially women and minorities, within this demanding career field.</li>
<li class="QnABodyStyle__markdownText___b9_I4">The article underscores the human element of nuclear deterrence, the operational challenges of aging systems, and the evolving nuclear landscape.</li>
</ul>
<p>Overall, the report underscores the need for robust defense investments, the challenges of modernizing nuclear forces, and the geopolitical threats posed by adversaries like Russia, China, and North Korea.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="answer_copyable_21811e0e-71c9-41c9-9188-3b92cf83bbe7" class="copyable_answers" data-testid="qna_answer">
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdown___oYf6O">
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div><a href="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ICBM-EAR-of-Week-of-2-17^^.Prepared-by-Peter-Huessy.pdf"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-29877" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png" alt="" width="346" height="96" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png 450w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT-300x83.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 346px) 100vw, 346px" /></a></div>
<div></div>
<div id="answer_copyable_21811e0e-71c9-41c9-9188-3b92cf83bbe7" class="copyable_answers" data-testid="qna_answer">
<div class="QnABodyStyle__markdown___oYf6O">
<p>​</p>
</div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-22-feb-2025/">ICBM EAR Report for 22 Feb 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-22-feb-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICBM EAR Report for December 20th</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-december-20th/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-december-20th/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2024 13:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Allies & Extended Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonus Reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense & Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Deterrence & Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABM Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force Global Strike Command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alert warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-52J]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballistic missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gertz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Military Power Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Fleischmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coercive threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia submarines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia-class submarines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-5 missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep fake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster relief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon Musk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F130 engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland missile defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypersonic missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM leg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligentized warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Finer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minuteman III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual assured destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New START]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear buildup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear deterrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio-class submarines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Joseph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Peters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robotic arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolls-Royce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentinel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipyard capacity.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLBM warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space-based defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space-based interceptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SpaceX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic defenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submarine launched missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Weeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.-ROK alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valery Gerasimov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=29686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Summary Report for ICBM EAR Report of December 20, 2024 The EAR Report is a must read for National security professionals to stay informed about rapidly evolving global threats and the strategic implications for U.S. defense policy. This report addresses critical developments in nuclear deterrence, missile defense, and geopolitical trends, and equips professionals with actionable [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-december-20th/">ICBM EAR Report for December 20th</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Summary Report for ICBM EAR Report of December 20, 2024</strong></p>
<p>The EAR Report is a must read for National security professionals to stay informed about rapidly evolving global threats and the strategic implications for U.S. defense policy.</p>
<p>This report addresses critical developments in nuclear deterrence, missile defense, and geopolitical trends, and equips professionals with actionable insights to navigate the complexities of modern security challenges effectively.</p>
<p><strong>Commentary and Quotes of the Week</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin</strong>: Reaffirmed the U.S.-ROK alliance and the strengthening of extended deterrence through the Nuclear Consultative Group.<br />
<strong>Peter Huessy</strong>: Detailed the financial and strategic implications of eliminating the ICBM leg of the U.S. nuclear triad, emphasizing the costs of alternative measures for maintaining current deterrence levels.<br />
<strong>Jon Finer, Deputy National Security Adviser</strong>: Highlighted Pakistan&#8217;s emerging threat with the development of long-range ballistic missile capabilities.<br />
<strong>Bill Gertz</strong>: Revealed China&#8217;s rapid nuclear buildup and the expansion of its missile capabilities.<br />
<strong>Russian Leaders</strong>: Asserted advancements in missile systems and dismissed arms control as a relic of the past.<br />
<strong>Rep. Chuck Fleischmann</strong>: Stressed the urgency of modernizing the U.S. nuclear deterrent, citing contributions from Tennessee&#8217;s Oak Ridge Lab.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Strategic Developments of the Week</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>China&#8217;s Military Build-Up</strong>: The Pentagon report highlighted Beijing&#8217;s dramatic advancements in hypersonic missile technology, nuclear warheads, and &#8216;intelligentized warfare.&#8217;<br />
<strong>Russia&#8217;s Strategic Actions</strong>: Russia&#8217;s legislative shift regarding the Taliban and progress in missile systems underlined its geopolitical maneuvers.<br />
<strong>U.S. Missile Defense Challenges</strong>: Reports emphasized the lag in U.S. hypersonic missile capabilities compared to China, pressing the need for enhanced missile defense systems.<br />
<strong>Space and Drone Developments</strong>: New legislation and technological advances highlight the increasing role of space and drones in modern warfare.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Important Reports of the Week</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong>&#8220;President Trump Must Put the Nuclear Enterprise on a Wartime Footing&#8221; by Robert Peters</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Advocates for accelerating nuclear arsenal modernization to restore deterrence credibility.<br />
Calls for a stronger commitment to stockpile stewardship and missile defense.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>&#8220;Importance of Building Homeland Missile Defense&#8221; by Robert Joseph</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Reiterates the vision of a comprehensive missile defense system to counter emerging threats.<br />
Proposes leveraging space-based systems for more robust and efficient protection.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>&#8220;What Happens if the United States Eliminates the ICBM Leg of the Triad?&#8221;</strong>:
<ul>
<li>Examines the repercussions of removing the ICBM leg, including massive financial costs for alternative deterrence methods and strategic vulnerabilities.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<h2><span style="color: #000080;">Download the Full Report</span><br />
<a href="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ICBM-EAR-Report-of-December-12.pdf"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-28926 size-medium" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Download-This-Publication-300x83.png" alt="" width="300" height="83" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Download-This-Publication-300x83.png 300w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Download-This-Publication.png 450w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></h2>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-december-20th/">ICBM EAR Report for December 20th</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-report-for-december-20th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
