<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Topic:Michaela Dodge &#8212; Global Security Review %</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/michaela-dodge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/michaela-dodge/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>ICBM EAR Week of March 3, 2025</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 13:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bonus Reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Adversaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administration Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appointees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edelman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European nuke deterrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geo-Strategic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland missile defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaela Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institute for Deterrence Studies. ​]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Nuggets. ​]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nixon Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuke Mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Blues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia border strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Hanson Essay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=30270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Executive Summary Why You Need This Report The ICBM EAR (Emerging Affairs Report) for the Week of March 3, 2025, prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geo-Strategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies, offers an authoritative, real-time assessment of critical defense and strategic developments impacting U.S. national security. This report [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/">ICBM EAR Week of March 3, 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Executive Summary</strong></p>
<p><strong>Why You Need This Report</strong></p>
<p>The ICBM EAR (Emerging Affairs Report) for the Week of March 3, 2025, prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geo-Strategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrence Studies, offers an authoritative, real-time assessment of critical defense and strategic developments impacting U.S. national security. This report consolidates essential intelligence and policy analysis on ICBM modernization, homeland missile defense, congressional budget battles, strategic threats from China, Russia, and Iran, and broader global deterrence dynamics.</p>
<p>As global threats intensify, <strong>policymakers, defense professionals, and industry leaders</strong> need a consolidated, insightful briefing to navigate the shifting landscape of great power competition and nuclear deterrence strategy. This report <strong>delivers precisely that—essential updates, expert commentary, and strategic foresight that decision-makers cannot afford to overlook.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Key Themes &amp; Strategic Insights</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><strong> Critical Developments in Homeland Missile Defense &amp; Nuclear Deterrence</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>The &#8220;Golden Dome&#8221; missile defense initiative, backed by congressional leaders and STRATCOM, underscores a growing commitment to protecting the U.S. homeland from emerging missile threats.</li>
<li>General Alvin, USAF Chief of Staff, affirms the Air Force’s pivotal role in nuclear deterrence and missile defense, reinforcing its responsibility for two-thirds of the nuclear triad and three-fourths of nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3).</li>
<li>Upcoming ICBM infrastructure modernization at Vandenberg Space Force Base highlights the urgency of maintaining a credible nuclear deterrent against adversarial advancements.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="2">
<li><strong> Congressional &amp; Budgetary Realities Impacting National Defense</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>As the FY25 budget debate intensifies, the threat of a yearlong Continuing Resolution (CR) poses risks to defense funding, potentially leaving the U.S. military underfunded by $8 billion below proposed levels.</li>
<li>Misinformation regarding an “8% defense cut” is addressed—while no drastic cuts are proposed, funding reallocations emphasize priority programs like Sentinel ICBM modernization and Columbia-class submarines.</li>
<li>With a $2 trillion annual deficit, balancing national security needs with fiscal realities remains a critical challenge.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="3">
<li><strong> Growing Threats from China, Russia, and Iran</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>China’s defense budget expands by 7.2%, accelerating military modernization, expanding nuclear capabilities, and strengthening island chain defenses in the Pacific.</li>
<li>Russia’s Arctic militarization, border buildups, and nuclear brinkmanship highlight its continued push for strategic dominance.</li>
<li>Iran’s sevenfold increase in highly enriched uranium (HEU) production, coupled with escalating proxy conflicts, presents a growing nuclear proliferation threat.</li>
<li>European defense spending surge ($860 billion over four years) signals a shift in NATO’s strategic posture amidst rising concerns over Russia’s long-term objectives.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="4">
<li><strong> Global Security &amp; Deterrence Policy: Special Reports &amp; Expert Analyses</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Heritage Foundation’s assessment of nuclear modernization emphasizes the necessity of rebuilding U.S. strategic deterrent forces to counter the evolving nuclear threats from Beijing, Moscow, and Tehran.</li>
<li>Michaela Dodge’s critical review of arms control policy challenges the viability of future U.S.-Russia agreements given Russia’s record of treaty violations.</li>
<li>Victor Davis Hanson debunks misconceptions about U.S. deterrence strategies, highlighting historical lessons in negotiations and military strength.</li>
</ul>
<ol start="5">
<li><strong> The Ukraine Corner: Understanding the Stakes</strong></li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Russia’s history of broken agreements, including violations of the Minsk Accords and Budapest Memorandum, justifies Ukraine’s insistence on binding security guarantees.</li>
<li>European defense commitments remain uncertain, despite recent rhetoric supporting increased military readiness.</li>
<li>U.S. policy under the Trump administration seeks to reshape geopolitical alignments, reduce Middle East entanglements, and focus on countering China.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ICBM-EAR-Week-of-March-3.pdf"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-29877" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png" alt="" width="331" height="92" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png 450w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT-300x83.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 331px) 100vw, 331px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/">ICBM EAR Week of March 3, 2025</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-week-of-march-3-2025/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICBM EAR for 23 Jan 25</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonus Reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Administration Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arms Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-21 raider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Yeaw.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elbridge Colby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escalation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extended deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexible response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Kendall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Kevin Chilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gennady Gatilov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geostrategic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Zero Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Budget Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian security threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jill Hruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Chilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Jong Un]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Rutte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massive retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michaela Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minuteman III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multipolar nuclear powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institute for Deterrent Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIDS seminar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear C3BM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear deterrence mythologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear force reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear mythologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear warheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Hegseth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Huessy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POTUS Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Nuclear Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia Defense Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SALT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentinel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slcm-n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[START]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triad Symposium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economic policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Nuclear Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USAF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=29937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICBM Ear for the Week of January 23, 2025 Prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geostrategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrent Studies Key Takeaways Significant Military Budget Increase in Russia: Russia’s defense spending will rise by 25% to 13.5 trillion rubles (~130 billion euros), continuing its high military expenditure trend. [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/">ICBM EAR for 23 Jan 25</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ICBM Ear for the Week of January 23, 2025</strong></p>
<p><strong>Prepared by Peter Huessy, President of Geostrategic Analysis and Senior Fellow at the National Institute for Deterrent Studies</strong></p>
<p><strong><u>Key Takeaways</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Significant Military Budget Increase in Russia:</strong> Russia’s defense spending will rise by 25% to 13.5 trillion rubles (~130 billion euros), continuing its high military expenditure trend.</li>
<li><strong>U.S. Defense Leadership Changes:</strong> Senator Marco Rubio has been confirmed as Secretary of State, with several other key appointments, including Peter Hegseth as Secretary of Defense.</li>
<li><strong>Nuclear Policy and Strategic Posture Adjustments:</strong> Discussions on nuclear deterrence focus on the modernization of U.S. strategic forces, balancing deterrence against Russia and China, and the implications of extended deterrence.</li>
<li><strong>Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Capabilities:</strong> Reports indicate Iranian cargo vessels carrying crucial chemical ingredients for missile propellant, raising concerns about Iran&#8217;s growing missile capability.</li>
<li><strong>Ukraine Conflict and NATO’s Deterrence Mission:</strong> NATO leaders stress that a Russian victory would severely weaken the alliance&#8217;s credibility.</li>
<li><strong>U.S. Nuclear Strategy and Extended Deterrence Debates:</strong> Several officials emphasize the need for a robust and adaptable nuclear strategy to counter emerging threats from Russia, China, and Iran.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>International Developments</u></strong></p>
<p><strong>Russia’s Defense Budget Expansion</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Russia&#8217;s military spending will increase to <strong>13.5 trillion rubles</strong>, estimated at <strong>7-8% of GDP</strong>, its highest post-Soviet military budget.</li>
<li>Significant investments in <strong>modernized nuclear and conventional forces</strong> to maintain strategic parity with the U.S. and NATO.</li>
<li>Russia’s total defense expenditure, when adjusted for purchasing power, rivals European military spending, highlighting its focus on long-term military capabilities.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Iran’s Missile and Nuclear Advancements</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Intelligence sources indicate <strong>Iranian cargo ships transporting missile propellant materials from China</strong>, raising alarms among Western security analysts.</li>
<li>Iran continues <strong>uranium enrichment</strong>, prompting <strong>warnings from the UN</strong> about Tehran’s growing nuclear capability.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>China &amp; Russia’s Nuclear Expansion</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Reports predict that by <strong>2035, China and Russia will collectively hold over 11,000 nuclear warheads</strong>, posing a direct challenge to U.S. nuclear deterrence.</li>
<li>Concerns grow over <strong>China’s accelerated nuclear development</strong> and its integration into a broader strategic competition with the U.S. and Russia.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>Key Strategic Issues on the Horizon</u></strong></p>
<p><strong>Escalation Risks in Space Warfare</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A <strong>RAND Corporation study</strong> warns that <strong>Russia may escalate conflicts in space</strong> early due to its <strong>heightened fears of a U.S. first strike</strong>.</li>
<li>The study underscores Moscow’s <strong>increasing risk tolerance</strong> and potential responses to perceived U.S. threats in space.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Ukraine’s Role in NATO’s Deterrence Strategy</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte</strong> warns that a Russian victory would weaken NATO’s credibility, requiring significant investments in deterrence.</li>
<li>U.S. extended deterrence remains <strong>under scrutiny</strong>, with debates over whether the <strong>Biden administration’s fear of escalation weakened deterrence against Russia</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>U.S. Strategic Nuclear Force Modernization</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The <strong>U.S. Air Force confirms</strong> that the <strong>Sentinel ICBM and B-21 Raider</strong> will remain the cornerstone of nuclear deterrence until at least 2050.</li>
<li>Discussions continue over potential <strong>mobile ICBM systems, expanded long-range bombers, and additional dual-use aircraft</strong> to ensure nuclear survivability.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>‘Iron Dome for America’ Missile Defense System</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>President <strong>Trump’s proposal for a nationwide missile defense system</strong>—similar to Israel’s Iron Dome—is gaining momentum.</li>
<li>Critics call it <strong>overly ambitious</strong>, but proponents argue that it is essential to <strong>counter growing threats from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>Key Events</u></strong></p>
<p><strong>Upcoming NIDS Seminar (January 31, 2025)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Speakers:</strong> Shoshana Byren (Jewish Policy Center) &amp; Ilan Berman (American Foreign Policy Council).</li>
<li><strong>Topic:</strong> Iranian security threats to the U.S. and its allies, with a focus on Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>NIDS conference at Truman Library (August 6, 2025)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A <strong>4-star USAF officer</strong> will serve as the featured speaker.</li>
<li>Expected discussions on <strong>extended deterrence, strategic stability, and nuclear policy</strong>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>Conclusion</u></strong></p>
<p>The <strong>ICBM Ear report for the week of January 23, 2025</strong>, highlights key developments in <strong>U.S. nuclear policy, global security challenges, and strategic deterrence issues</strong>. With <strong>Russia&#8217;s increasing military budget, Iran&#8217;s missile advancements, and China’s nuclear expansion</strong>, the U.S. faces <strong>a growing multipolar nuclear environment</strong>. Discussions on <strong>extended deterrence, arms control, and new strategic capabilities</strong> will shape U.S. defense posture in the coming years. The upcoming <strong>TRIAD Symposium and NIDS events</strong> will provide further insights into these critical security matters.</p>
<p><a href="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-Ear-for-the-week-of-January-23.pdf"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-29877 size-medium" src="http://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT-300x83.png" alt="" width="300" height="83" srcset="https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT-300x83.png 300w, https://globalsecurityreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ICBM-EAR-REPORT.png 450w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/">ICBM EAR for 23 Jan 25</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/icbm-ear-for-23-jan-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
