<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Topic:Attributable responsibility &#8212; Global Security Review %</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/attributable-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/subject/attributable-responsibility/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Should artificial intelligence be banned from nuclear weapons systems?</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/should-artificial-intelligence-be-banned-from-nuclear-weapons-systems/</link>
					<comments>https://globalsecurityreview.com/should-artificial-intelligence-be-banned-from-nuclear-weapons-systems/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GSR Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI & Deterrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attributable responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Deterrence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=28064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By: Professor Steffan Puwal Against a backdrop of conflict and global security concerns, 2023 may prove to have also been a pivotal year for automated nuclear weapons systems. A year that began with chatbots and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as the subjects of major news stories &#8211; some with particularly concerning headlines &#8211; ended with members of the [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/should-artificial-intelligence-be-banned-from-nuclear-weapons-systems/">Should artificial intelligence be banned from nuclear weapons systems?</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By: <strong>Professor Steffan Puwal</strong></p>
<p>Against a backdrop of conflict and global security concerns, 2023 may prove to have also been a pivotal year for automated nuclear weapons systems.</p>
<p>A year that began with chatbots and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as the subjects of major news stories &#8211; some with particularly concerning <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/06/ai-warfare-nuclear-weapons-strike/673780/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">headlines</a> &#8211; ended with members of the United States Congress introducing <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/1394?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22senate+1394%22%7D&amp;s=1&amp;r=2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">legislation</a> to ban AI systems from nuclear weapons and US President Biden signing an <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/10/30/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order</a> on the subject. The issue was even raised in discussions between the United States and China at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, which met in San Francisco in November.</p>
<p>One can imagine a hypothetical scenario in which a nuclear weapon targets a naval base, but an approach pattern recognition determines that the target submarines have already put to sea, and so the missile opts for a redirected underwater strike instead of an atmospheric detonation. This is but one of many possible scenarios to consider involving AI.</p>
<p>AI systems offer an opportunity to strengthen nuclear deterrence by providing a more accurate and capable defensive nuclear response. The purpose of making nuclear weapons more accurate and capable is not to promote their usage. Such capabilities, instead, provide a more credible deterrence to nuclear war and are consistent with classic nuclear doctrine. AI is simply a strategic tool, like nuclear weapons themselves.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2024/04/12/should-artificial-intelligence-be-banned-from-nuclear-weapons-systems/index.html">Read More</a></p>
<p><a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/should-artificial-intelligence-be-banned-from-nuclear-weapons-systems/">Should artificial intelligence be banned from nuclear weapons systems?</a> was originally published on <a href="https://globalsecurityreview.com">Global Security Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://globalsecurityreview.com/should-artificial-intelligence-be-banned-from-nuclear-weapons-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
