Comments on: Learning to Love the Atom Again: Why the Future of Artificial Intelligence is Nuclear https://globalsecurityreview.com/learning-to-love-the-atom-again-why-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-is-nuclear/ A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS) Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:13:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.6 By: Michael Ferguson https://globalsecurityreview.com/learning-to-love-the-atom-again-why-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-is-nuclear/#comment-5725 Thu, 25 Jun 2026 15:13:11 +0000 https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=32341#comment-5725 Hi, Richard. Thank you for your interest in my article. Would you please elaborate on what you mean by “not true”? The short direct quote in the opening sentence of this article is not paraphrased—it comes from the official White House press release of President Eisenhower’s address on that date. The quote is accurate and can be found on page 7 in the link below. I look forward to hearing from you.

https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/sites/default/files/file/atoms_Binder13.pdf

]]> By: GSR Staff https://globalsecurityreview.com/learning-to-love-the-atom-again-why-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-is-nuclear/#comment-4631 Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:31:14 +0000 https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=32341#comment-4631 Richard McPherson – Thank you for pointing that out. We appreciate the correction and take accuracy seriously. To reflect this, we’ve added the phrase “– in paraphrased terms –” to clarify that the wording reflects a commonly used paraphrase of President Eisenhower’s speech rather than a direct quote. Our goal is always to be both valuable and precise.

]]> By: Richard McPherson https://globalsecurityreview.com/learning-to-love-the-atom-again-why-the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-is-nuclear/#comment-4283 Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:19:02 +0000 https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=32341#comment-4283 The comment in one of your deterrence articles about what President Eisenhower stated on December 8, 1953 was not true. You should apologize and remove it.

]]>