<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Investing in National Security: The Case for Fostering Competition in the Defense Industry	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/investing-in-national-security-the-case-for-fostering-competition-in-the-defense-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/investing-in-national-security-the-case-for-fostering-competition-in-the-defense-industry/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alexis S		</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/investing-in-national-security-the-case-for-fostering-competition-in-the-defense-industry/#comment-285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexis S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=27954#comment-285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Aaron, thanks for your article! 

I wanted to bring some perspective on your section about nuclear weapons facilities. While I am in agreement the defense sector needs more competition, the nuclear security enterprise does not function in a similar capitalistic/competitive manner that DOD procurement does. All DOE/NNSA sites are government owned/contractor operated. This would mean that even the addition of another assembly/disassembly plant would not be capable of reducing overall costs for building nuclear weapons. The two sites would never be competing with each other to see which can assemble/dissemble warheads the &#039;cheapest.&#039; Further, the cost to build another nuclear site is astronomical. Take a look at pit production in Savannah River, turning the old MOX facility into a pit production site is going to cost at least $6.9 - $11.1 billion and many years to do so. There is limited political capital to even support our current modernization plans.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron, thanks for your article! </p>
<p>I wanted to bring some perspective on your section about nuclear weapons facilities. While I am in agreement the defense sector needs more competition, the nuclear security enterprise does not function in a similar capitalistic/competitive manner that DOD procurement does. All DOE/NNSA sites are government owned/contractor operated. This would mean that even the addition of another assembly/disassembly plant would not be capable of reducing overall costs for building nuclear weapons. The two sites would never be competing with each other to see which can assemble/dissemble warheads the &#8216;cheapest.&#8217; Further, the cost to build another nuclear site is astronomical. Take a look at pit production in Savannah River, turning the old MOX facility into a pit production site is going to cost at least $6.9 &#8211; $11.1 billion and many years to do so. There is limited political capital to even support our current modernization plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph Buff		</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/investing-in-national-security-the-case-for-fostering-competition-in-the-defense-industry/#comment-264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Buff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 13:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=27954#comment-264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am rapidly becoming one of Aaron Holland&#039;s nuclear deterrence fans! This essay reveals his usual excellent quality  offering of context, insights, &#038; actionable recommendations. All with concise compelling clarity -- the 3 C&#039;s of good nonfiction writing. I&#039;m delighted &#038; privileged to have co-authored some articles with Aaron for NIDS&#039;s Global Security Review. (Some of these were posted recently, some are in the GSR submissions hopper with Editor Adam Lowther, and some are now in the research &#038; drafting stage.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am rapidly becoming one of Aaron Holland&#8217;s nuclear deterrence fans! This essay reveals his usual excellent quality  offering of context, insights, &amp; actionable recommendations. All with concise compelling clarity &#8212; the 3 C&#8217;s of good nonfiction writing. I&#8217;m delighted &amp; privileged to have co-authored some articles with Aaron for NIDS&#8217;s Global Security Review. (Some of these were posted recently, some are in the GSR submissions hopper with Editor Adam Lowther, and some are now in the research &amp; drafting stage.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
