<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FYI to the GOP on NATO	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/fyi-to-the-gop-on-nato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/fyi-to-the-gop-on-nato/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brandon		</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/fyi-to-the-gop-on-nato/#comment-1872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=30655#comment-1872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Powerful, clear, and long overdue. Thank you, Alan Dowd, for this compelling reminder.

This is more than a history lesson—it’s a wake-up call. The timeline of NATO support—from Korea to Kosovo, Afghanistan to the Red Sea—makes one thing indisputable: NATO has shown up for America time and again, especially after 9/11.

Article 5 wasn’t just words on paper. It was Canadian pilots patrolling U.S. skies. British and German troops fighting and dying alongside ours in Afghanistan. Allies deploying when we called.

Now, with Europe rearming and confronting 21st-century threats, the question isn’t “Are they doing enough?” It’s “Are we honoring their sacrifices and trust?”

America’s leadership in NATO should reflect gratitude, strength, and strategic foresight—not threats, withdrawal talk, or transactional ultimatums.

Reagan got it right: “An attack on you is an attack on us.”
Let’s not forget who echoed that back to us when we needed it most.

#NATO #NationalSecurity #Article5 #TransatlanticAlliance #AlliesMatter #StrategicLeadership]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Powerful, clear, and long overdue. Thank you, Alan Dowd, for this compelling reminder.</p>
<p>This is more than a history lesson—it’s a wake-up call. The timeline of NATO support—from Korea to Kosovo, Afghanistan to the Red Sea—makes one thing indisputable: NATO has shown up for America time and again, especially after 9/11.</p>
<p>Article 5 wasn’t just words on paper. It was Canadian pilots patrolling U.S. skies. British and German troops fighting and dying alongside ours in Afghanistan. Allies deploying when we called.</p>
<p>Now, with Europe rearming and confronting 21st-century threats, the question isn’t “Are they doing enough?” It’s “Are we honoring their sacrifices and trust?”</p>
<p>America’s leadership in NATO should reflect gratitude, strength, and strategic foresight—not threats, withdrawal talk, or transactional ultimatums.</p>
<p>Reagan got it right: “An attack on you is an attack on us.”<br />
Let’s not forget who echoed that back to us when we needed it most.</p>
<p>#NATO #NationalSecurity #Article5 #TransatlanticAlliance #AlliesMatter #StrategicLeadership</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
