<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: American Legitimacy and Integrated Deterrence	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://globalsecurityreview.com/american-legitimacy-and-integrated-deterrence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/american-legitimacy-and-integrated-deterrence/</link>
	<description>A division of the National Institute for Deterrence Studies (NIDS)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 12:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph Buff		</title>
		<link>https://globalsecurityreview.com/american-legitimacy-and-integrated-deterrence/#comment-365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Buff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://globalsecurityreview.com/?p=28270#comment-365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent article! The possible drawback to integrated deterrence is that some good folks aren&#039;t sure what it really is, while other commentators (like moi) suspect it&#039;s (to some in the arms control crowd) a thin disguise for moving away from nuclear retaliation to conventional-only armed retaliation or even just -- watch out here! -- economic sanctions.

The idea of what used to be called &quot;soft power&quot; is sound and wise and necessary. Properly applied as a concept and as a strategic influencer, integrated deterrence is simply the modern use of soft power to deter via the usual threat/promise of retaliation if friendlies are attacked. No?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article! The possible drawback to integrated deterrence is that some good folks aren&#8217;t sure what it really is, while other commentators (like moi) suspect it&#8217;s (to some in the arms control crowd) a thin disguise for moving away from nuclear retaliation to conventional-only armed retaliation or even just &#8212; watch out here! &#8212; economic sanctions.</p>
<p>The idea of what used to be called &#8220;soft power&#8221; is sound and wise and necessary. Properly applied as a concept and as a strategic influencer, integrated deterrence is simply the modern use of soft power to deter via the usual threat/promise of retaliation if friendlies are attacked. No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
